Third-seeded Mikhail Youzhny of Russia was the first player to advance to the Swiss Open quarterfinals as rain affected play Wednesday. Youzhny beat Denis Istomin of Uzbekistan 6-3, 6-2 in the only second-round match completed. Marcel Granollers, the No. 8 seed from Spain, took a 6-1, 4-3 lead over Russia’s Igor Andreev as afternoon rain ended play in the clay-court Roy Emerson Arena.

The NBA lockout isn’t keeping Carmelo Anthony from bouncing a ball on a New York court. The New York Knick is slated to take part in the annual Arthur Ashe Kids’ Day at the U.S. Open in Queens. The Aug. 27 tennis and music event will be held on the eve of the two-week tennis championships. Defending champions Rafael Nadal and Kim Clijsters (KLY’-sturz) are scheduled to appear there, as…

Second-seeded Nadia Petrova of Russia defeated Canada’s Eugenie Bouchard 6-2, 6-2 in 52 minutes to advance to the quarterfinals of the Citi Open. The 32nd ranked player in the world overpowered Bouchard by winning 19 of 22 first-serve points. Petrova will next play fifth-seeded Bojana Jovanovski of Serbia, who held on to beat American Jill Craybas 6-4, 5-7, 6-4.

Watch More Videos from:
at

Watch More Videos from:
at

It’s time to peek, with trepidation, into the comments again. If there was any doubt as to whether Novak Djokovic would inspire fan passion to rival that of Roger Federer’s or Rafael Nadal’s, it has been put to rest on this website. A reminder: Wherever your loyalty may lie, whether you’ve decided to spend your time reminding me of my incorrect predictions, or accusing me of writing while American, try to say something constructive or interesting or funny. Insults, etc., will be deleted. And it will make this column much better in the future.

*****

In agreement up to a point [with my article about today’s male players being gentlemanly on court]. But both Nadal and Djokovic do a lot of chest-thumping and fist-pumping, which I find to be less than sporting—trudat

Yes, fist-pumping and chest-thumping and screaming in celebration were not part of the old Aussie rules, the ones that are still the standard in most people’s minds for tennis behavior. But the sport does evolve, and I’ve come to like this new aspect of it. While they may annoy their opponents, and while repeated exhortations by my own opponents would almost certainly annoy me, I don’t believe Nadal’s leg kicks or Djokovic’s chest thumps are done with vicious intent. They’re meant to fire themselves up and bring their desire to the surface, which I don’t see as unsporting. I can understand why fans who believe that Roy Emerson and Co. were the be-all and end-all of tennis decorum would be appalled, but to me the show of positive energy and emotion is added entertainment.

But maybe I’m the wrong guy to ask: I was also a fan of Lleyton Hewitt’s lawnmower multi-punch routine and “Vicht!” fingers-to-the-forehead sign. I guess you pick your Aussie style.

*****

Everyone was a little madder and badder in the late 70s, early 80s. But then again, if you lost your s&%t on court it didn’t get broadcast over the Internet a million times. You have no choice but to be more respectful on court today. Look what happened when Ferrer hit a ball in the stands in the general direction of a crying baby. And then there’s Serena but I don’t want to start a riot on this thread so I’ll stop there.—Michele

The Internet of the Johnny Mac era were the new “shotgun” microphones that started to appear courtside in 1980 and especially ’81. McEnroe and Gerulaitis complained that they made it sound as if the players were louder and more aggressive than they really were. McEnroe, typically I guess, thought they had been invented mainly to capture what he was saying. Gerulaitis compared the situation to baseball, where players weren’t followed around by microphones. “What do you think Reggie Jackson says when he runs into the wall in right field?” Vitas asked. “‘Ooh, I hurt my heady-poo?’”

But it’s true, anything you do now is instantly available everywhere forever and ever. And there was more of a sense of rebellion in general in those days. The 60s got to tennis a decade late.

*****

An alternate hypotheisis. I agree that evolution is going on here but I suspect it is not the players evolving but the game. Perhaps it is something about how power is generated with the new racket technology – start out slow and smoothly harness power from the legs with loose body dynamics for maximum racket head speed. I find when I am aggressive, I snatch at the ball, which either flies towards the fence or meekly crosses the net. Perhaps it is today’s tennis audience unwillingness to tolerate even the slightest bad behavior – witness the boo’s Djokovic gets when he begins even the slightest complaint. Either way, both are apsects of today’s game that weeds out the hotheads from the top echelon of the game.—5.0 wannabe

I’m not sure about your power argument, but one evolutionary element I left out of my post on today’s sporting men is the effect of Hawk-Eye. It lowers the temperature all around. And, as you said, it may make tennis audiences less tolerant of negative acting-out, because it happens so much less often now.

***** 

During my junior year in high school, in Rhode Island, we used two elements of the VASSS scoring system — the no-ad game scoring and the 9-point tiebreak. And I loved it. Each game could be decided in a sudden death point, once the score reached 3-3 (like 40-40, or deuce). The receiver, naturally having the disadvantage (in those days, anyway), had the option of which service box to take the serve, thereby mitigating the server’s advantage somewhat. It made for all kinds of interesting tactical decisions, because if I was receiving at 3-3, and my opponent had double-faulted in the ad court at 2-1 or 3-2 to bring it to sudden death, I might just make him serve into the ad court again, begging him to try NOT to think about his previous double-fault. Or, if my opponent was a lefty with a wicked slice serve that tailed away from my one-handed backhand, I might choose to receive the 3-3 point in the deuce court, taking away his most prominent advantage.—Slice-n-Dice

Now that I think about it, I played No-Ad all through high school and college. I don’t know if it was better or worse than deuce games—you got used to it, and there was an added sense that the mentally stronger and calmer player, the one who could handle those 3-all points, was going to prevail. But I did think it could skew a match too far toward those sudden-death points. I can remember winning and losing matches by extremely misleading scores. The tiebreaker, yes, that was essential, if only for TV viewing, but tennis is already weighted toward the “big points” enough as it is to go with No-Ad.

*****

It’s quite weird, but through tennis I got to I utterly love the windows of anti-normality; ok, it’s nice to watch Wimbledon or RG semis and final matches after lunch, but there’s something unreal and infinitely exciting and thrilling about huddling on a chair in front of the computer in January, thick woolen socks on, radiators blasting at full capacity, in the middle of the night, everything deadly silent, I feel like I’m stealing life transfixed by the luminent blue courts, blinding sunshine and sweating, lobster-red crowds trying to watch the match. So I do look foward to the American summer, esp USO and my trips to the fridge where cold grapes have now become my traditional “strawberries and cream” of the last slam.—noleisthebest

It’s true, watching at oddball hours makes you feel like a true fan and maybe appreciate what you’re seeing more. One of my favorite tennis memories is staying up until something like 3:00 A.M. to see Younes El-Aynaoui beat Lleyton Hewitt at the Australian Open in 2003 (it was the match before the epic with Roddick). It wouldn’t have been the same if I’d taped it and watched it at my leisure the next morning. As great as it was to go to the Australian Open this year, I missed the wee-hour viewing from the other side of the planet

***** 

yes, we are not gracious winners- we are gloating!! you are right, nole is much more gracious than some of his fans. that’s why we like him.—parker

This, at least, is funny.

*****

I really like the title of this “rally”: The New Landscape. I’m really enjoying The New Landscape in both the men’s & women’s tours. As a Rafa fan, it has been hard to see him beaten so regularly by Nole. But, he’s been beaten soundly each time, and as a tennis lover i enjoy watching anyone playing “in the zone” as Novak is doing. It’s been a real delight to watch him play, and i’m plenty up for “more of the same”. Of course, i am hoping that Rafa finds a way to turn the situation around and return to winning against him instead of losing (Haha I’m still hoping the same for Rog against Rafa)- but i’m also really digging the “challenge” that Novak’s offered the other top guys. Can anyone meet it? Not yet. But i hope they can.—jodiecate

Thanks for your sanity and overall positivity about the sport as it stands right now

*****

Fernando says much too much analysis—Fernando

Tignor respects Fernando, but disagrees.

Read More Tennis’s News from:

at

In her first match under new coach Nigel Sears, former No. 1 Ana Ivanovic falls 6-3 7-5 to Ayumi Morita at Stanford. Ivanovic just began working with Sears last week. She also rehired her former fitness trainer, Scott Byrnes away from Victoria’s Azarenka’s team after Wimbledon.  During the grass court season, Ivanovic reached the semifinals of Birmingham and the third rounds of Eastbourne and Wimbledon.

“I just started with a new team and takes time for things to come into place and nerves played a part to impress the new coach, but that’s normal,” she said. “We spoke a lot about things we were working on, but [Nigel said] when you go out there I want you to trust your instincts, but I still thought too much about technical stuff. It’s matter of practicing and doing it over and over until it becomes automatic. A few times I was not aggressive enough and was thinking too much what I had to do.”

The 23-year-old, who spent 10 days in at the beach in Spain relaxing with her brother and relatives after Wimbledon, said that she is not going to push herself to get immediate results.

“I know there are few tournaments coming up, I have to defend a lot of points, but for me now until the end of the year it’s about getting the work done, consistency, getting the base built up again and getting comfortable with my game.” she said. “Of course I’d like to see the results straight away and win tournaments, but sometimes that’s how it goes and it takes time to get certain things into place. But I trust this team I have around me and I know good things are going to happen and it’s just a matter of time. At the moment, I don’t want to put pressure and think about results, just put the hard work in.”

Read More Tennis’s News from:

Maria Kirilenko said that last week’s wedding between former player Elena Dementieva and hockey’s Maxim Afinogenov in Moscow was the best one she ever attended. Kirilenko went to the wedding with her long time boyfriend, fellow Russian player Igor Andreev. Other players to attend the Olympic gold medalist’s wedding were Yevgeny Kafelnikov, Vera Zvonareva, Dinara Safina, Svetlana Kuznetsova, Elena Vesnina and Vera Dushevina, among others.

“Elena and her husband were always with the guests,” Kirilenko told TENNIS.com at Stanford, where she will face Serena Williams in the second round. “They were sitting with us, talking on the microphone, they were dancing together. It was unbelievable. Normally when you go to wedding, you are sitting and watching and it’s kind of boring.”

Kirilenko said that the newlyweds performed a duet, singing a love song to each other while dancing.  “Elena told me they practiced a lot. I was surprised she sang well.”

Kirilenko said that before Dementieva tossed the bouquet, that Dementieva winked at her to go to the middle of the pack and try to catch it. But she had no such luck.

“All the girls were trying to catch it and then suddenly from somewhere Dushevina came and sprinted and stole it from me,” Kirilenko said with a laugh.

Read More Tennis’s News from:

After blowing past  Australian Anastasia Rodionova 6-0, 6-0 in the first round of the Stanford Classic, Serena Williams says that she believes she can return to the top of the sport. Williams, who is currently ranked No. 169 as she only has two tournaments in her ranking points total, will play Russia’s Maria Kirilenko in the second round.

“I want to get back to the top,” Williams told reporters. “And I have no patience. But maybe this is teaching me to be more patient. And it’ll come, but not necessarily — number one is great, but I really want to be able to do well in the Grand Slams.”

Williams also returned the compliments paid to her by Maria Sharapova, whom she may face in the quarterfinals. The two former No. 1s once cool relationship now seems to have thawed and they were recently pictured together at the ESPYs.

“I really like playing Maria and I really admire her and never giving up and developing the confidence that she has,” Serena said. “Always just walking around and having so much aplomb, it’s good. I always admired that, it’s really cool.”

Read More Tennis’s News from:

Former top 10 player Guillermo Canas of Argentina is continuing to coach Ernests Gulbis at the Farmers’ Classic in Los Angeles. Canas worked with the hard-hitting Latvian at Wimbledon and also trained him during the mid-summer break. On Tuesday in Los Angeles, Gulbis stopped a five-match losing streak with a 2-6, 6-3, 7-6 (5) win over Xavier Malisse.

Read More Tennis’s News from: