Home » September, 2011 Entries posted on “September, 2011”

Murray downplays strike talk to reporters



Andy Murray downplays talk of a potential player strike. “We’re only proposing small chances, a few less mandatory events and some more rest periods,” he told reporters at the tournament in Thailand. “Tennis is in a great place right now and no one is yet talking about a strike. There are just a few minor things we’d like to see changed and we hope to sit with the ATP and other officials and discuss them. Two or three more weeks off a season is what we are thinking of. There is no rush. I never said anyone wanted to strike, we hope it doesn’t come to that. But we do want some small changes. I don’t think we’re talking about anything major. We’d like to talk and see what can be done. It would be good to see changes made sooner rather than later.”

September 30 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com | Read More »

WTA’s Allaster: We’d play best-of-five at Slams



WTA CEO Stacy Allaster tells the Daily Yomiuri that the women players are ready to play best-of-five set matches at the majors, despite the fact that most women players who have been polled on the subject, including Maria Sharapova and Serena Williams, have said that they would prefer not to.

Allastar was responding to a suggestion that the three out of five sets that the men play at Grand Slams over the women’s two out of three makes the effort unequal. “We don’t pay a different price for a three-hour movie versus a two-hour movie. The women prepare as hard as the men,” she said. “And we’ve always said we’d play five sets, and the Grand Slams have said no, we don’t want you to.”

September 30 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com | Read More »

Jelena Dokic’s father Damir still banned from WTA



Jelena Dokic’s father Damir, who has begun training his daughter again, remains banned from attending WTA tournaments, Bloomberg reports. The two reconciled this week. “As a result of previous incidents, Damir Dokic is not eligible to receive a credential for WTA tournaments,” WTA spokesman Andrew Walker said. “Beyond that, each tournament has the right to decide, based on their own security considerations, who is eligible or ineligible to purchase a seat at an event.”

September 30 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com | Read More »

Brooklyn Decker on why Andy Roddick has three wedding rings

Why has Andy Roddick purchased three wedding rings since his marriage to model Brooklyn Decker?

[Photos: See more of Brooklyn Decker]

a. He has one to match all of his Lacoste kits.

b. One is for casual situations, one is for fancy situations and the other is for casual-fancy situations.

c. He switches rings based on who he’s lost to most recently: Djokovic, Nadal or Federer.

d. None of the above.

The answer is always “none of the above,” at least that’s the theory that got me a (heavily rounded) 3.0 GPA in college.

[Related: Video: Andy Roddick does Serena Williams impression]

Other popular stories on Yahoo! Sports:
Fans chase soccer team off field
Did potion from MLB manager’s wife trigger epic comeback?
Why Bears Hall of Famer is skipping White House visit

September 30 2011 | Posted in Busted Racquet | Read More »

Video: Sharapova turns ankle during match in Tokyo, retires

Video: Sharapova turns ankle during match in Tokyo, retires

How tough is Maria Sharapova? The world No. 2 stepped awkwardly after a serve in her quarterfinal match in Tokyo and fell to the court when her left ankle buckled. Minutes later, the ankle was swollen to twice its size and the three-time Grand Slam champion had to be helped out of the locker room and taken to a hospital for an MRI. Yet in the seconds following the injury, Sharapova barely winced.

The injury happened with Sharapova serving at 3-4 in the first set of a Wimbledon finals rematch against Petra Kvitova:

Sharapova immediately knew the injury was serious. “I felt a sharp pain and next thing I knew I was on the floor,” she said. “It swelled up immediately and I knew there was no way I could continue.” (Swell it did. Look at how big the ankle is at the end of the clip.)

The results of Sharapova’s MRI are not yet known. Her retirement ends any chance Sharapova had at taking the No. 1-ranking away from Caroline Wozniacki this season.

September 30 2011 | Posted in Busted Racquet | Read More »

Around the World in 1000 Words

Pic2

by Pete Bodo

Howdy. Ready for another edition of our weekly news feature? These are still fairly slow times on the major tennis tours, so most of our items will focus on off-court events, so let's get right at it.

Now Sharapova, That's a Different Story!

Anna Chakvetadze has been named as a candidate for the Duma (the representative assembly of Russia) by the Right Cause political party. Chakvetadze has been through a great deal since she was the victim of a gruesome home invasion in 2007 (Chakvetadze was bound and gagged and her father Djambuli was beaten; the crooks escaped with over $300,000 USD worth of goods and cash).

Right off the bat, Anna's career nosedived. A career-high No. 5 in September 2007—she hit that number shortly before her home was invaded—she was ranked No. 70 by the end of 2009. But she regained some ground, only to collapse earlier this year due to a gastro-intestinal illness. When she returned to the tour, she began to suffer mysterious fainting spells. Anna lost in the first round of Wimbledon to Maria Sharapova and hasn't played a competitive match since; when she withdrew from the U.S. Open she cited a bad ankle as the cause. But the fainting spells have persisted, we understand.

Right Cause is a pro-business party led until recently by billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov, and is said to enjoy the support of just two percent of the population. It would seem that Chakvetadze's oddly shaped career and personal travails would raise some red flags among voters. And you have to wonder if the Moscow Times reporters didn't have some difficulties getting face-time with Anna in the past, given the paper's caustic comment on Chakvetadze's candidacy: "Right Cause will pose no threat to the Kremlin after it decided to trade President Dmitry Medvedev for a second-tier female tennis star on its party list for the elections."

Ouch!

Headlines We Love. . .

Jelena Dokic's Father Damir Still Banned From WTA.

This one reminded us of that long-running gag on Saturday NIght Live, the one that produced the repetitive "this just in" breaking news alerts: Generalissimo Franco Still Dead. However, the tennis version of that headline does raise some interesting issues, given that Jelena Dokic has been working out again under the supervision of her disgraced dad Damir.

Dokic is training with Damir in Serbia, but is still in an "on" phase of her on-again/off-again relationship with her adopted continent/nation of Australia. Hence, this release on the sensitive subject of Damir Dokic from Tennis Australia. Jelena's explanation of her situation is downright touching.

"I would like to confirm media reports that I have reconciled with my father. My partner Tin Bikic and I have visited my father at his home to finally put an end to our disagreement. I initiated the meeting as I want to reunite my family and allow us all to get on with our lives and be happy. This has gone on too long. I am in a very positive and confident frame of mind in my life and I really wanted to do this because I believe it is the right thing to do both for me and for all of my family. My father was very receptive and I believe he has changed greatly. He understands that I am my own person who makes my own decisions."

Okay, but—what's the WTA going to do if and when it comes to this little matter of on-court coaching?

Are You Doing This Just to Make Us Look Bad?

All-England Club chairman Philip Brook has told the Lawn Tennis Writer's Association that Wimbledon officials are contemplating building a roof over Court No. 1, which would give the venerable Grand Slam site two covered courts in case of rain. The Australian Open also has two courts with retractable roofs (Rod Laver and Hisense Arenas), and one is in the works for the re-design of Roland Garros. The U.S. Open still has no roofed stadium.

Furthermore, Wimbledon showed signature foresight when it built Court No. 1 as part of the Millenium renovation in 1997, designing the stadium (the capacity is over 7,300, with not a bad seat in the house) so that a retractable roof could be added to the structure later. We notice that the USTA built Ashe the same year—without comparable planning, much to the outfit's present chagrin.

This will undoubtedly put the USTA under even more pressure to find a solution to a problem that's looking more and more like it belongs to a different century (unfortunately, an earlier one). But that won't be easy. The engineering problems and costs of retro-fitting relatively new Arthur Ashe stadium with a roof are prohibitive. That's partly because of Ashe's epic scale: with a capacity of over 23,000, it's the largest tennis stadium in the world.

Of course, it almost never rains at Wimbledon any more, now that the Centre Court as a retractable roof. So I'm proposing that the USTA get some parachute cloth and a few miles of bungee cord and rig up some kind of flimsy cover for Ashe, which would pretty much guarantee that the rain that has forced a Monday final the last four years will never happen again.

But seriously. I don't know what the solution is, but I think the way to approach the problem is to decide that, whatever is done, the show must go on. Rain cannot be allowed to bring the entire tournament to a grinding halt. Simple as that, for a starting point. If that means rebuilding one of the smaller venues or a block of outside courts to create a modest covered stadium, do it. If that means stationing ball boys and girls all around the courts holding giant umbrellas to keep the rain off, do it. If it means exploding a medium-sized nuclear warhead high up in the atmosphere to disperse. . . well, let's not go quite that far.

But it's a pretty easy rule to understand, embrace, and prioritize, even if it's still being ignored at Flushing Meadows: The show must go on.

Pic Tell me Again Do They Call Them "Majors?"

Maria Sharapova went down at the Pan Pacific Open today with an ankle injury, throwing any hope she may have entertained for finishing the year as the No. 1 player in jeopardy. On the other hand, No. 3 seed Victoria Azarenka advanced today with a convincing 7-5, 6-0 rubout of Marion Bartoli. Azarenka also has a shot at the No. 1 ranking that currently belongs to Caroline Wozniacki (who was upset in Tokyo earlier in the week).

Wozniacki embarked on the fall season with an enormous number of points to defend (almost 2800). She lost just one match after the U.S. Open, the last official WTA match of the year (l. to Kim Clijsters in the finals of the WTA Tour Championships). Should she lose early next week in Beijing and at the championships as well, Sharapova, Azarenka, Vera Zvonareva or even Li Na could overtake her—but every one of them would need to catch fire the rest of the way.

Sharapova has the most to gain and least to defend; she won just one match last fall. But her ankle injury raises serious concerns. Azarenka, on the other hand, is a streaky player and last year her schedule included Moscow as well as Tokyo and Beijing. If she plays the same events and goes on the kind of torrid streak she put together this spring, and Wozniacki falters, Azarenka could give us something the WTA doesn't necessarily need: A third, different "slamless" year-end No. 1 player in four years (Jelena Jankovic and Wozniacki are her antecedents). 

It will reinforce the idea that that if you want to be the WTA No. 1, the first thing you need to do is avoid winning one of them there Grand Slam thingies.

You Can Come Out From Under the Bed, Marian, Uncle Toni. . .

What's with the spate of high-profile coaching changes/firings? We saw above that Jelena Dokic has re-connected with her bizarre dad, Damir. And now the China Daily informs us that Li Na has split with Michael Mortensen, the coach to whom she gave so much credit when she won that historic first Grand Slam at Roland Garros. I really like Li, but I have serious questions about what she expects or wants out of a coach. Or maybe she's just too cheap to pay these guys what they want and/or deserve. It's been known to happen.

Meanwhile, Kim Clijsters has deep-sixed Wim Fissette (or is it the other way around? According to Clijsters' website, Fissette claims to want "to go his own way." Cue Stevie Nicks) in favor of Carl Maes. We assume this is all just in case Kimmie decides to play tennis again—rumor has it that she's going to make a comeback at the U.S. Open of 2018, after bearing three more children.

Melanie Oudin has dumped her long-time private coach, Brian DeVilliers, in favor of the USTA's Tom Gullikson. And who could have ignored the news that the love-hate relationship between Donald Young and the USTA is on again? Mike Sell, the former coach of Monica Seles, is traveling in Asia with Donald this month. And Ilona Young, Donald's mother and long reputed to be a source of some of the problems between the USTA and Young, is along on the trip too—as a sightseer. Or so they say…

Not to be outdone in the break-up and make-up department, another young American has mended fences with his former coach. Young Jack Sock, who paired with Oudin to win the U.S. Open mixed doubles title, has rehired Mike Wolf after a split lasting a few weeks.

Somebody Had to Say It. . .

This story about (top) player discontent and rumblings about potential job actions and other labor-related confrontations is one that just won't go away—at least not until we finish with the CCS, or Calendar Complaint Season. Don't we go through comparable wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth every fall, and doesn't Rafael Nadal complain about the calendar as reliably as the aspen leaves turn gold come October?

Not to pick on poor Rafa or anything, but. . . Yet the gravity and tone of the conversation is certainly is a little different this year—partly because the CCS got off to an early, electric start because of the bad weather at the U.S. Open.

I see that a few crusty and much-respected veterans weighed in on the calendar/off-season issues just the other day. Pete Sampras and Jim Courier were both quoted at Tennis Grandstand on the issues that have been bandied about here. But listen to what Sampras had to say:

"I think if the players want to get things done, they all have to get in the same room, the top ten guys, they all agree upon one thing, and they walk out of that room with a definite decision, that’s the only way things will get done. Everyone is complaining about the schedule. In Davis Cup, even when I was playing and before, [the scheduling] didn’t work, we complained about it, but nothing really got done…The top guys have so much power, they have all the power. It’s a name-driven sport. If Nadal, Murray, Djokovic and Federer don’t play something, or threaten to do something, it will get done, trust me."

This begs the question: So if that's all it really takes (and let's face it, that isn't much), why hasn't it happened already, back when Pete and Jim were playing, or even before?

There's only one real answer: Because you couldn't get the 10 guys in a room, or if you did you couldn't get them to agree on a course of action. The latter is the most likely explanation. I don't know why you wouldn't run into the same obstacle(s) you have today. Let's not forget—the calendar was designed with complete input from . . . the players. That's right. From the way people are talking you'd think some big meanie at the ITF or ATP had shoved this down the players' throats. There's a reason for why the calendar is what is, and the ATP players checked off on it every step of the way. Hey, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are currently on the ATP board, are they not? 

Courier took a surprisingly hard-nosed stance (could be that because he's now a tour promoter/entrepreneur, he actually understands something of how the tennis business works). He said: "Everyone in this sport, since Billie Jean King and Arthur Ashe and Stan Smith fought for Open tennis, we’ve all been overpaid, grossly overpaid, for what we do. So let’s be clear that this not a pity party."

No, it's just the time of year. Calendar Complaint Season is in full swing.

September 30 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com Blog | Read More »

Sharapova quits match with twisted ankle (AP)

Maria Sharapova twisted her ankle while serving Thursday and quit her Pan Pacific Open quarterfinal against Petra Kvitova in a rematch of this summer’s Wimbledon final. Kvitova was ahead 4-3 in the first set when Sharapova was injured. Sharapova limped to her chair and pulled out after speaking with her trainer.

September 29 2011 | Posted in Yahoo! Tennis | Read More »

Stars Visit SmashZone on Worldwide Day of Play

September 29 2011 | Posted in USTA | Read More »

Sharapova out with twisted ankle, Azarenka advances



TOKYO (AP)—Second-seeded Maria Sharapova was eliminated from the Pan Pacific Open on Thursday when she was forced to retire because of an injury in the first set of her quarterfinal match against Petra Kvitova.

With her Czech opponent leading 4-3 in the first set, Sharapova twisted her left ankle when serving in the eighth game. She limped to her chair and pulled out after speaking with her trainer.

“I hit a serve and then landed awkwardly on my left ankle,” said Sharapova, who went to a hospital for an MRI. “I felt a sharp pain and next thing I knew I was on the floor. It swelled up immediately and I knew there was no way I could continue.”

Thursday’s quarterfinal was a rematch of this year’s Wimbledon final, where Kvitova beat Sharapova 6-3, 6-4 for her first major title.

“It’s sad because we were both playing so well,” Kvitova said. “It was a great match but I could see (the ankle) was really big. Hopefully, she will be OK.”

Kvitova will now face fourth-ranked Vera Zvonareva of Russia, who defeated Maria Kirilenko 6-3, 6-3, in Friday’s semifinals.

“I played her already three times, the last time in Madrid on clay when I beat her,” Kvitova said. “She’s a very good player. She has a great serve and hits the ball well so it will be a tough match.”

Zvonareva had five aces and improved to 6-0 in head-to-heads against the unseeded Kirilenko.

“I’m really happy that my serve helped me today,” Zvonareva said. “The first serve was good and my second serve even caused her some problems, and that made a big difference.”

Kirilenko knocked out U.S. Open champion Samantha Stosur on Tuesday and beat 12th-seeded Ana Ivanovic on Wednesday, but struggled with her serve against Zvonareva and was broken three times.

“Maria is a great player and a great fighter, and proved it by beating two tough opponents on her way to the quarterfinals,” Zvonareva said. “There is no secret to beating her. I just tried to make some shots that caused her some discomfort and was able to do that.”

Also, third-seeded Victoria Azarenka of Belarus beat seventh-seeded Marion Bartoli of France 7-5, 6-0 to reach the final four. She will next face Agnieszka Radwanska of Poland, who beat Kaia Kanepi of Estonia 6-2, 7-6 (7).

September 29 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com | Read More »

Young tops defending champ Garcia-Lopez in Bangkok



BANGKOK (AP)—American Donald Young beat defending champion Guillermo Garcia-Lopez of Spain 6-1, 6-7 (0-7), 7-5 on Thursday in the second round at the Thailand Open.

The fourth-seeded Spaniard, who received a first-round bye, saw his title defense crumble after two hours and 30 minutes of a baseline battle.

Victory for the 22-year-old Young secured a place in his second ATP quarterfinals, having reached the semifinals in Washington last month.

Young next plays Go Soeda of Japan, a 6-2, 7-6 (9-7) winner over Tobias Kamke of Germany.

September 29 2011 | Posted in Tennis.com | Read More »